Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
New Jersey Voters Oppose New Casinos, But State May Still Need to Consider It editorial policy.
  1. Austria’s ‘Poker King’ Folds His Hand, Declares Concord Card Casinos Bankruptcy Over €600 Million Tax Bill

Compare Accounts
×
Kentucky Sports Betting Bill Set for Photo Finish as Lawmakers Return to End Session
Provider
Name
Description
MGM Cotai in Macau Site of Suspected Double Homicide  CFTC Says PredictIt Founder Will Get Fair Chance to Refute Allegations Against Exchange  Bernie Sanders Attacks Station Casinos and ‘Trump Supporting’ Fertitta Brothers Over Palms Union Clash  Century Casinos ‘Incredibly Cheap’ Compared to Peers, Says Analyst  Petersburg Mayor, City Council Defend Cordish Pick for Casino Referendum  NFC Sunday Night Showdown Between Packers and Niners Highlights NFL Week 12  Sightline Payments Hits $1B Valuation, Becomes Nevada’s First Fintech Unicorn  Ferdinand ‘Bongbong’ Marcos Jr. Wins Controversial Philippines Presidency  Seven Ex-Winnebago Tribal Council Members Sentenced for Theft of Funds from WinnaVegas Casino  Arkansas Regulators Want Unique Revenue Rule on Interactive Sportsbooks